Index: myfeature.html
===================================================================
--- myfeature.html (revision 10417)
+++ myfeature.html (revision 10418)
@@ -40,16 +40,20 @@
themselves. The success rate is somewhat more random, obviously.
3. If you don't have free time
-Consider donation: buy someone else's time. To do so, contact me
-(see the contribution howto page). Since
-you don't need to cover all costs and the hourly rates are much lower
-on a pet project, and your feature may be simpler than it looks, and
-someone who already knows the code also saves the learning curve, it may
-all be cheaper than you think. The success rate should be close to 100%.
+Consider donation: buy someone else's time, e.g.
+ sponsor the
+project with small donations.
-However, this is a last resort solution, the above ones are clearly preferred.
+You can also directly buy the development time for the feature you need;
+contact me (see the contribution
+howto page). Since you don't need to cover all costs and the hourly
+rates are much lower on a pet project, and your feature may be simpler
+than it looks, and someone who already knows the code also saves the
+learning curve, it may all be cheaper than you think. The success rate
+should be close to 100%.
+
4. If you don't have anything to contribute with
[DEL:Vote for it in the
feature poll. If your feature is not there, ask on the mailing list.
@@ -57,7 +61,7 @@
are somewhat good. Else chances are very low, but not zero.:DEL]
Because of 100% passivity of the geda community, I decided not to spend more
-time on community-related tasks. The poll is there, you can use it,
+time on community-related tasks there. The poll is available, you can use it,
but you will have to organize at least 5 active, capable users who are
committed enough to spend significant time on testing/supporting development.
I will consider implementing your feature only if you can bring and keep